Dive into the chaos of varying degrees of gore fallen unipolar world democracy

Unipolar world in which the solution for everyone takes one country will inevitably sink into increasing chaos, and not because the US leadership - these are some bad people in particular. They are ordinary.

For supporters of democracy and the unipolar world with a single pole in the US (take, for example, the recent Maxim Kantor lyrics to “Freedom”) again and again, you can come across among the authors in the pages of publications, which position themselves as “free” and “liberal.”

Let me say that democracy - and logically and practically - is incompatible with the unipolar world. And if Obama’s message is the contradiction looks, in general, quite naturally, the performance of “liberal activists” inhabiting a fair distance from the Pole - just absurd.

Democracy - a system built on the recognition that people are not virtuous. People - the fallen beings. They tend to pursue their personal and group interests to the detriment of others and abuse their authority when they have the opportunity arises. Therefore, democracy built checks and balances that need to get people to take the interests of each other, and the government - to act strictly within the rules.

Faith in unipolarity, in contrast, is associated with faith in the goodness of people - at least some of them. It suggests that the very sole pole of power will take care of the welfare of others and refrain from abuse, with no checks and balances - simply because it is inherent virtue.

You can not be both an advocate of democracy and unipolarity. You can not simultaneously demand the election, successive, limited and accountable government at the national level and call on his head a world power, which does on your votes and does not depend in any way in front of you does not report, on a global scale.

Monopolyus as a power center, located outside the country, and not accountable to its residents - it is something, in principle, and all items are incompatible with democracy.

The current global hegemon - the United States - in itself can have a democratic system that encourages politicians to act in the interests of citizens. Not all agree with that, but we will, for simplicity, the case that this is so.

But this does not mean that American politicians will, or at least be able to act in the interests of strangers. There are no checks, no feedback system which will encourage them to do so.

The results we have seen. Western intervention in Iraq and Libya, support for the revolution in the Ukraine led only to a significant deterioration in living standards. Why?

It’s not malice as such; Nobody wanted it to plunge the region into chaos. Just when the decisions that determine the life and death of people, taken by the authorities of another country, the people have no opportunity to influence them. And it will be very bad decisions.

15 January 2016

Confidence in the presence of democracy in Russia has increased from 8% in March 2014 to 16% today. 46% believe that Russia needs a “very special, corresponding to national traditions and specifics of democracy”
The Northern Fleet will be looking for new islands in the Arctic

• To make the parliament work more efficiently, the scientists propose to include in his composition of a group of deputies elected not vote, and a random lottery »»»
It is considered that the democratic system of government - perhaps the peak of perfection.
• Confidence in the presence of democracy in Russia has increased from 8% in March 2014 to 16% today. 46% believe that Russia needs a "very special, corresponding to national traditions and specifics of democracy" »»»
Those who believe that in today's Russia "is partly a democracy", as it became more - 46% against 38% in 2014, say sociologists.
• Director of the Kurchatov Institute Kovalchuk: Science in Russia revives »»»
Interview published 9/28/1910. Quote: I absolutely competent in these matters and I can say that people who leave here are divided into several groups.
• Russia ranked 32-th out of 38 in the ranking of scientific literacy »»»
Reflected in this test, the questions were only part of what the respondents were asked the authors of studies in the past in several countries.
• October 14, 1964 after the plenum of the Central Committee of the CPSU to resign sent Nikita Khrushchev. How it went? »»»
His reign was a time of reform, not all of which were successful.